Go Free Ministries Blog

The Pursuit of Freedom

Lydia Clarke — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:50:00 GMT

From ministering to hurting people for over 20 years, and having been one of those hurting people, I have discovered a very sad, yet significant truth: one of the most effective and debilitating weapons used by Satan to ensnare people and sustain their bondage is deception. In John 8:44, Jesus made this strong statement in a discourse with the Jews:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

This scripture exposes Satan’s identity as a murderer and liar. He is not only described as a liar, but the FATHER of lies in whom there is no truth. It’s easy, then, to understand why deception is his weapon of choice.

Lies, in and of themselves, are harmless. Lies can bombard us all day long, and as long as they go in one ear and out the other, they pose no threat. Conversely, when we ponder them, and subsequently fall into agreement with them, regarding them as truth, we slip into Satan’s trap and find ourselves constantly struggling to be and do all God has planned for us. We are hindered in our ability to walk in the gift of freedom Jesus died to purchase.

As Jesus conversed with the Jews in John 8, some believed on him, and to them He spoke these words recorded in verses 31 and 32:

“If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples in deed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

How deep and powerful this is! We see here, not just a statement, but an established principle—knowing the truth will make you free. There is liberty in knowing truth; yes, even in those instances when the revelation of the truth causes momentary pain.

On the flip side of this principle, another principle also exists. Just as the truth makes you free, lies surely bind you. I believe that at the root of every bondage is a lie. An untruth which Satan has spoken through the mouths/actions of people, through circumstances; or just through our own misconceptions or ignorance.

The most effective force against deception is truth. So then, what is truth? In John 17:17, Jesus makes it plain in this prayer to the Father: “Sanctify us through thy word; thy word is truth.” God’s Word is truth. Therefore, when the Word of God becomes the standard by which we live and the diet by which we nourish our spirit and soul, we become less vulnerable to lies and are freed to attain all God has destined for us. Contrary to what some believe, living for God is not confining or restrictive; rather it liberates us to experience life to its fullest--not just outwardly, but inwardly as well.

Contemplate your own need for freedom by considering these questions. Do you find yourself always going in circles? Are you experiencing the same results, viewing the same scenery, and/or bumping up against the same unknown invisible wall as you attempt to move forward in life? If so, begin the process of emancipation with the following steps:

• Receive Jesus. In John 14:16, Jesus says, “I am the way, the TRUTH,
  and the life.” Making Jesus Lord of your life affords you access to the truth.
• Ask the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of Truth according to John 14:17 and 15:26)
  to lead you into the truth for those areas with which you are struggling.
• Hear, study and meditate on God’s Word. As you do, its light will expose
  the dark places in which lies have hid .
• Renounce the Lies. As they are revealed to you, fall out of agreement
  with them. Declare that they will no longer bind you and keep from realizing
  your God-given potential.
• Continue to renew your mind with the truth -- God’s Word.

Are You Really Free?

Lydia Clarke — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:45:00 GMT

Freedom. What a glorious word! Simply reading or hearing it triggers an intuitive sense of justice; an internal knowing that it’s a right and must be possessed at all costs. Throughout the ages, this innate instinct has thrust even the gentlest souls into fierce conflicts and has resulted in countless lives being lost on battlefields, plantations, prison grounds, borders, and in defiant marches and protests.

Many of the freedoms we currently enjoy were obtained through courageous battles against injustices like governmental oppression and slavery. The price of these freedoms, which are often taken for granted, were paid with a valuable currency - blood.

Thank God for America, the “Land of the Free” and its many freedoms. Foreigners eagerly migrate to America to quench their thirst for freedom and its benefits. However, as wonderful and enviable as these freedoms may be, unfortunately, they are limited to the external realm.

If we could steal a glimpse of America from the inside of its citizens, a totally different picture would emerge. We’d see grim images of oppressive bondage: hearts, minds, wills, and emotions bound in burdensome chains and fetters; dreams, visions, and untapped potential locked away in jail cells with unknown keys.

Who will pay the price and fight to liberate those whose minds are held captive by oppressors like torment and/or negative self-image? Who will wage war against the unseen enemies who ravage men and women’s emotions with fear, depression, and rage? Can the power of the United States’ armed forces fight and win this battle for freedom? Can police restore order to this internal chaos? Can protests on the steps of governmental headquarters buy freedom for the spirit and soul?

The answer is, “No!” Absolutely not. It’s a battle that cannot be won with man-made weapons. Who then is able to pay the price which liberates captive, hurting souls?

The good news is that One has already shed His blood, fought the battle, and won our freedom. Who is He? He is Jesus Christ, the Son of the living God. His death, burial and resurrection have freed us from the hard bondage of sin, and have given us the legal right to walk as free men and women in our hearts and our minds.

Jesus has paid the price for our freedom, but many are yet bound in various areas of their lives because they do not know or understand the liberty available to them in Christ. Others know, but don’t comprehend the power they possess through Christ’s victory to break free from their tormentors’ snare.

The blood has been shed and the battle won. Now it’s time for the real you—the you God intricately and meticulously designed--to emerge from the chains and dark prison of spiritual and emotional bondage and fulfill your God-given purpose and destiny.

It’s time for you to truly go free!

The Oddities Surrounding The Murder of George Tiller

Lydia Clarke — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:48:00 GMT

The shooting of George Tiller is a tragic event. A man lost his life, and others lost a husband, a father, friend, brother, and co-worker. My hearts grieves for his natural family and his church family.

I cannot presume to know what Scott Roeder was thinking, but looking at his actions and reported history, it appears he somehow reasoned it was acceptable to kill a man, but unacceptable to kill babies. Odd, isn't it?    One would think murder is murder. Equally as odd is the outrage and disgust expressed over Dr. Tiller's murder by those who support abortion. These folks have somehow reasoned it is acceptable to kill babies, but unacceptable to kill a man. I don't get it.

One statement I read regarding Dr. Tiller's murder bemoaned the fact that Dr. Tiller was killed in what is considered to be a "safe place"--a church.  I agree. God's house should be a safe place, and I am distressed whenever I hear of a killing in a church. Dr. Tiller must have considered the church a safe place as well since it appears while there, he lacked his usual bodyguard protection. When I read this statement, however, another "safe place" came to mind--the womb. One would think this would be one of the safest places on earth; a place of nurturing, growing, peace and rest.  Unfortunately however, the womb has become the setting for a shocking number of violent murders.

I am truly saddened by what happened to Mr. Tiller, but I am also saddened by the fact that Mr. Roeder and abortion supporters are blinded to the incongruity of justifying one violent murder while disdaining another.

President Obama said, "I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence."  Ya think? That is exactly what abortion is--a heinous act of violence. Can't wrap my brain around this.

You Can't Lose the Right to Choose, Part 2

Lydia Clarke — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:03:00 GMT

Every minute of every day men, women, boys and girls are making decisions to do what they want regardless of the laws of the land. People are running stop signs, exceeding speed limits, stealing, embezzling, murdering, raping, assaulting, and so on. Are there laws against these things? Certainly there are, but in and of themselves they do nothing to alter a person’s right to choose. Consequently, the truth of the matter is women, men, boys and girls will always have the right to choose. It is a God-given right, and the government cannot take it away.

Words are important—critically important—and in this abortion battle, close attention must be paid to the words that are used. When it comes to the “right to choose,” abortion supporters use it within the context of a woman’s choice as it relates to her body. They say that a woman should be able to choose what she does with her body. There are bumper stickers and signs that command, “Keep your laws off my body.”

Of course this sounds like a worthy fight, doesn’t it? Who wouldn’t want to defend personal freedoms like what we do with our bodies, especially in America, where freedom is supposedly what makes this nation so great. This so-called battle for a “woman’s right to choose what to do with her body,” however, is merely a smoke-screen to cover the real issue, which is the fight to enable a woman to terminate her child’s life at will with no legal consequence. But no one is going to say that. Who is going to publicly support the murder of a child? So the wording has to be changed to make the act more palatable. Thus, we end up with the fight for the “right to choose.” We must not get caught up in the passion and the rhetoric, but step back and look at the real underlying issues.

The fight is for choice, but not necessarily for what a woman does with her body. It is a fight to choose her consequences also. With every choice or decision, there are results, repercussions, consequences. It’s inherent in the decision. It comes as a package.

Not done yet--stay tuned for more. . .

You Can't Lose the Right to Choose, Part 1

Lydia Clarke — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:29:00 GMT

I overheard a conversation in which a few of my friends were discussing how words and symbols that once had innocent or godly meanings are now used to represent various forms of ungodliness. Take the rainbow, for instance. God created the rainbow as a reminder that He would never again cover the earth with a flood as He did in Noah’s day. Today, instead of this symbol reminding us of God’s promise, it is widely recognized as a symbol of lesbianism.

A similar misrepresentation of words and symbols has infiltrated the abortion movement. What comes to your mind when you hear the words, “pro-choice?” Do you think of someone who advocates the right to choose? Or do you think of someone who supports abortion? In this day and time, the term “pro-choice” automatically brings to mind someone who advocates abortion. “Choice” or the “right to choose” has now been misconstrued and reduced to a term that is equated with murder.

To get a better understanding of what many people are aggressively, yet blindly defending, let’s take a look at the origin of “choice.” Where did our right to choose originate? Who gave women the right to choose? Was it the Supreme Court in its high and lofty role when it made the decision to legalize abortion in 1973? Did Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, give women this special ability? Was it the National Organization of Women or another feminist group? Was it the result of women fighting and picketing like they did for the right to vote?

To all of the aforementioned, no. The right to choose, not how it has been redefined in this age, but in its purest sense is a gift given to mankind, both men and women, by God Himself and was exercised by the first-formed man and woman in the Garden of Eden. Yes, contrary to what many may believe, God is pro-choice. Please understand that I said God is pro-choice, not pro-abortion. In and of itself, pro-choice just means “for choice.”

God in His infinite wisdom gave us what no other earthly creature possesses a free will. Unlike the rest of creation, we humans do what we do because we choose to, not because of some basic instinct or urge. Despite widespread claims of the “I can’t help its,” we all have the right and the ability to make choices. This right and ability originated with the Lord.

He is sovereign and powerful, so it would have been an effortless task for Him to make us automatons with no other desire than doing His will, His way. But the pattern He chose from which to make us is His image and likeness, and this pattern includes a free will. He desires worshippers who worship Him because they choose to, not because they have to. We, as human beings, know that love and commitment is far sweeter when it flows to us out of hearts that willingly choose to love, as opposed to being coerced. God certainly desires no less.

His desire for willing worshippers is seen in Joshua 24:15, where Joshua, the leader of Israel, set this ultimatum before the people:

And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

This desire can also be seen in the ultimatum presented to Israel by the prophet Elijah in I Kings 18:21:

And Elijah came unto all the people and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? If the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.

His stance on choice is also seen with angels. He created them, but in doing so, He also gave them the freewill to choose whether or not to serve Him. Eventually, one-third of the angels in heaven exercised their freewill to rebel against God, pledging their allegiance to Satan and joining him in his fall.

Deuteronomy 30 further confirms the fact that God is pro-choice. Verse 15 says,

See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil.

Then, verse 19 says,

I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing;

In these two verses of scripture, God is setting before His people a list of options from which they can choose: life, death, blessing, evil and cursing. In doing this, He is allowing them to exercise their ability to choose the direction of their lives.

Thus, we do not possess the right to choose because our country’s government passes a law giving us that right. We will always have the ability to exercise choice regardless of what the government does because God created us with this wonderful ability. So, please understand this one important point: Laws banning abortion do not take away a woman’s right to choose.

Stay tuned for part 2 . . .

You Can't Vote Based on Just One Issue!

Lydia Clarke — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:17:00 GMT

Well, the 2008 election is over, and I am relieved - not so much because of the outcome, but because the decision for whom to vote was nothing short of agonizing. So allow me to exhale a great big WHEW!

I know, I know. . . You are probably thinking what some of my peers were thinking (and saying for that fact). That is:

"I don't understand why you are having a hard time with the decision. Isn't it obvious who should be the President? You must not have looked at what he stands for, and what he can do for this nation?"

Quite to the contrary, I did look. As a matter of fact, I looked at both sides. Mr. McCain struck a sour note with me for many reasons. Yet, when I researched Mr. Obama, it was kind of refreshing to see that several of his plans reflected my own desires for what I would like to see happen in our nation. So, like my peers, you may ask, "So what's the problem. What would keep you for voting for him?"

The problem stemmed from a few issues on which we disagree, and one in particular that became the looming mountain that precluded me from jumping on the Obama bandwagon. I really wanted to jump on that bandwagon. I mean, as a biracial black woman who did not think I would see any possibility of a black president in my lifetime, I wanted to contribute my vote to making history and putting him in office. And from what I could tell, he seemed to be a man with a plan who could possibly unite our sorely divided nation. Not only that, but I knew in my heart he was going to win. Still, what became the reins around my volition yanking me to a grinding halt whenever I thought I may have reasoned myself into supporting him with my vote was that ONE ISSUE. To vote for him would be a violation of my deeply rooted personal convictions.

Now if someone had said to me what I'm saying here, I would probably say, "Well, do what you think you have to do." Unfortunately, though, I didn't hear that. Maybe if I had, the decision-making process would have been easier. However, what turned it into sheer agony was the the statement that I heard repeated seemingly in surround sound from friends, the pulpit, and co-workers-- "You can't vote based on just one issue!" I was instructed by those whom I highly respect to consider all of my values when making the decision, not just one.

While attempting to heed this counsel, I learned something about my values that was not obvious to me before--my values have different "values." Maybe others' values carry equal weight, so the quantity of issues which a presidential candidate promises to positively impact becomes their deciding factor. But that is just not the case with me.

My conviction that it is wrong (not to mention inhumane, horrible, savage) to take the lives of innocent unborn children through abortion weighs heavily on my heart. These are lives who receive a death sentence, not for a heinous crime, but just for existing or for not being perfect. They cannot run and hide; they cannot appeal the decision, plead their case, ask for help, beg for mercy, or seek a pardon. Child Protective Services cannot rescue them. They possess no voice and receive no protection. This makes it difficult for me to vote for a man who vehemently supports denying these children their right to live. But what makes it nearly impossible for me to vote for him is that he does not stop there. No, he takes it to a whole other level. He is willing to have medical care denied for babies who survive an abortion (research the Born Alive Act). That's just cold. I have heard it said that support for Obama is evidence that we are now in the midst of fulfilling Martin Luther King's dream of a time when people would not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Mr. Obama's stance on abortion and babies born alive after an abortion strikes serious concern in me about his character. How hard your heart must be to think it is just to leave aborted babies born alive to die. It is scary. It is also ironic seeing how one of his most popular platforms is health care for everyone. Obviously, he did not mean everyone.

As I stated before, I knew he would win. However, now I must do as the Bible commands and pray for him. And I do. I pray that God's will be done in him and through him and that his heart would be pliable in the Lord's hands.

So, can you vote based on just one issue? It depends on the issue.

Is Marriage Still Honorable?

Lydia Clarke — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:55:00 GMT

On Valentine's Day 2007, my son proposed marriage to his girlfriend. He's 22 and a senior in college and she's a 19-year old college freshman. After their proposal, I heard others comment that they are too young to marry. When they announced they'd like to get married in August, I then heard comments judging August as too soon. I seriously began to wonder, how old do you need to be to get married? How do you determine the "right time" or "right age" to get married?

Let me say, in this day and time we're living in, I admire my son for even wanting to marry at his age. I think it's...well...honorable. I don't want to presume to talk for God, but I think He would think it honorable as well. I base this on Hebrews 13:9 which says, "Marriage is honorable. . ." Honorable means worthy of honor and respect. These days, marriage seems to have lost its honor and is seen more of a bondage, a trap, and something of which we should be terrified. But I don’t believe this is how God intended it to be.

Negative views of marriage lead to putting marriage on hold. And I believe the postponement of marriage can open wide the door to sexual sin. In 1 Corinthians 7:7, Paul says, “For I would that all men were even as myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.” It seems that he is saying that he preferred that people remained single as he was, but he recognized that not everyone has the gift of singleness or celibacy. And don’t we know that! It takes something special to be single and celibate, not just in this day, but obviously in that day as well. He goes on to say in verses 8 and 9, “I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.” This is so interesting to me because some people maintain long lists of prerequisites and prequalifications for marriage, but Paul here boils it right on down. If you can’t keep yourself sexually, then it’s just better to get married.

Keep that in mind as we read what Paul says back in verses 1 and 2: “Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for man not to touch a woman. Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.” Again, Paul brings the timing of marriage right back to sex.

I’m not saying this should be the sole guideline for marriage. In this article, I’m dealing moreso with the “when” but there are scriptures where God issues guidelines for the “who.” I’m just making a point that we attach more to getting married because of our own negative past experiences or the experiences of other couples than what I see in the Word of God. And a whole lot on folks’ list of prerequisites and prequalifications for marriage deal with money. Is that God? Ironically, people are told to wait to get married based on things we are told NOT to worry about in Matthew 6.

I don’t believe that a lack of money has to lead to divorce. If that was the case, I would’ve been divorced years ago; but my husband and I have a good marriage, despite the financial issues we’ve dealt with. Again, it’s not a lack of money that causes divorce, but a lack of faith. A couple can wait to get married until they have all kinds of good paying jobs and money in the bank, but if, let’s say, they work for Ford and all of a sudden have no job, then what? Should they have not gotten married? Should they now divorce? No. They just have to believe God together that He will do what He said in Matthew 6.

Pre-marital counseling, formal and informal, is a good thing because the Bible says that in the multitude of counselors there is safety. But my concern is that the counsel being dished out is more human than godly. It emanates more from a standpoint of marriage as dishonorable than honorable. I get concerned when people are told they “have to” wait, especially when there’s no discussion of whether or not they can contain themselves. Should anyone tell a couple they can’t get married? How does that fit in with 1 Timothy 4:3 that describes one characteristic of departing from the faith as forbidding to marry?

If you look at Paul’s advice on marriage again, you’ll notice that he said he preferred that all men were single like him (not based on the disrespect of marriage, but based on his experience of being able to serve God without distraction), but the next sentence begins with a “but”. Again, he recognized that everyone was not like him. We can have our opinion of when and how people should get married, and offer that counsel, but ultimately, they need to do what they need to do. It’s unfair to ask them to delay marriage without understanding whether or not they can contain themselves.

My son’s desire to marry at 22, to me, reflects the honor his dad and I attach to marriage. In the midst of our own troubles, we’ve still tried to focus on the fact that our marriage is a good thing. So, it is disheartening to hear people—in the church and outside--advise him from a reference point of their own disappointments, fears, regrets, misconceptions and/or disdain for marriage, as opposed to God’s Word which says marriage is honorable.

In over two decades of talking and counseling with married people, I’ve come to realize that no matter how “perfect” the circumstances are when a couple marries, EVERYBODY has marital issues and challenges. Pre-marital counseling is great in that it helps to identify areas that may or will be problematic. However, I believe once an area comes out in counseling, it’s up to the couple alone to determine whether they will be able to deal with it.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. I’m teachable and open to differing opinions, as long as they are biblical.

You've Got to Move!

Lydia Clarke — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:44:00 GMT

"You've Got to Move!" This is the word the Lord gave me in March 2007 for the women of Ekklesia Fellowship Church in Ypsilanti, pastored by Victoria James. The Lord showed me that they were waiting for God to come into their situation and move on their behalf, but He was saying to them, as if in a chess or checkers game, "It's your move."

This same word applies to many of us in our spiritual walk with God. We want God to do something, to move in our lives, yet we stay still.

You may be stuck in your spiritual journey, but God wants to take you to another place. Somewhere called the Promised Land. Somewhere called fulfilled purpose and destiny. Somewhere call a greater level of spiritual maturity where you are not just saved, but reproducing, birthing spiritual children, manifesting God's presence here in the earth, and making a change in the lives of people, your community, and world.

Listen to this message and learn how you can get unstuck, and move to the place where God wants you to be.

Radio Interview on Water Through the Word

Lydia Clarke — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:33:00 GMT

In March of last year, I recorded a radio interview with Erin Campbell on her Water through the Word broadcast regarding my post-abortion experience and the book, Can't Keep Silent. You can listen by clicking below.

Please visit Erin's website at www.waterthroughtheword.com.

Stop the Madness

Lydia Clarke — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:38:00 GMT

For some time now, a close friend of mine has been urging me to set up a blog; but the thought of adding one more thing to my already seemingly never-ending to-do list was pretty repulsive. However, after reading a recent article online, my tolerance for ridiculosity was pushed far beyond its capacity, and I now find myself with a burning need to blog.

As a result of my procrastination, I feel as if I'll explode with all the thoughts and insights I have pretty much had to contain because of time constraints. But I won't. I will not explode and gush all over you, the reader. I'll just begin with the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back that has thrust blogging to the top of my long list of things to do.

The pivotal article to which I am referring reported on South Dakota’s decision to outlaw abortion with the exception of the mother’s health. I was extremely excited to see this progress in the movement to end the horror of abortion. The article also conveyed Planned Parenthood’s expected dismay at the passing of this legislation. Their dismay, however, focused on the fact that poor women would now be forced to drive to another state to have an abortion. “Forced” to drive to another state? Forced? That’s ridiculous!

“Forced to drive …” makes it sound as if a poor woman has no other option but abortion. Her only option is to make that trip. But what about the option of actually having the baby? What about the option of having the baby and putting it up for adoption? Outlawing abortion does not “force” a woman to do anything. She does what she does because she chooses to.

This issue may appear trivial to you, but for me, this was just the last straw in a series of pro-choice views that fall way too short of solving the issues women face in childbearing. In future entries, I will discuss these views, and their inherent inadequacies.

Lastly, the article also spoke of an anonymous donor who offered one million dollars to defend the legislation passed in South Dakota. While I was elated to discover that there are people willing to make such enormous contributions to stop abortion, I was also saddened by the fact that this donation and others like it could have been used to help the “poor women” referred to by Planned Parenthood raise their children. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: If we could gather all the funds, time and energy that pro-lifers and pro-choicers commit to defending their side of the abortion battle to instead develop means (apart from abortion) of helping women overcome the obstacles they face we, as a society, would be stronger and healthier.

The process of developing solutions to difficulties is always more efficient and productive when we join forces, as opposed to fighting throughout it. The challenge, however, is accurately identifying the problem(s) for which we need to rally to solve. We can begin with the process of elimination: a woman's problem is NOT the child developing in her womb.

Look for more on this . . .